Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Oct 2005
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2005a%26a...442..345r&link_type=abstract
Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 442, Issue 1, October IV 2005, pp.345-349
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
22
Sun: Magnetic Fields, Sun: Corona, Sun: Flares
Scientific paper
Together with the magnetic energy, the magnetic helicity is an important quantity used to describe the nature of a magnetic field configuration. In the following, we propose a new technique to evaluate various components of the total magnetic helicity in the corona for an equilibrium reconstructed magnetic field. The most meaningful value of helicity is the total relative magnetic helicity which describes the linkage of the field lines even if the volume of interest is not bounded by a magnetic surface. In addition if the magnetic field can be decomposed into the sum of a closed field and a reference field (following , Berger 1999 in Magnetic Helicity in Space and Laboratory Plasmas, ed. M. R. Brown, R. C. Canfield, & A. A. Pevtsov, 1), we can introduce three other helicity components: the self helicity of the closed field, the mutual helicity between the closed field and the reference field, and the vacuum helicity (self helicity of the reference field). To understand the meaning of those quantities, we derive them from the potential field (reference) and the force-free field computed with the same boundary conditions for three different cases: a single twisted flux tube derived from the extended Gold-Hoyle solutions, a simple magnetic configuration with three balanced sources and a constant distribution of the force-free parameter, and the AR 8210 magnetic field observed from 17:13 UT to 21:16 UT on May 1, 1998. We analyse the meaning of the self and mutual helicities: the self and mutual helicities correspond to the twist and writhe of confined flux bundles, and the crossing of field lines in the magnetic configuration respectively. The main result is that the magnetic configuration of AR 8210 is dominated by the mutual helicity and not by the self helicity (twist and writhe). Our results also show that although not gauge invariant the vacuum helicity is sensitive to the topological complexity of the reference field.
Amari Tahar
Canfield Richard C.
Regnier Stéphane
No associations
LandOfFree
Self and mutual magnetic helicities in coronal magnetic configurations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Self and mutual magnetic helicities in coronal magnetic configurations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Self and mutual magnetic helicities in coronal magnetic configurations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1617652