Computer Science – Cryptography and Security
Scientific paper
2009-04-26
Computer Science
Cryptography and Security
HotOS 2009
Scientific paper
In this paper, we question the common practice of assigning security impact ratings to OS updates. Specifically, we present evidence that ranking updates by their perceived security importance, in order to defer applying some updates, exposes systems to significant risk. We argue that OS vendors and security groups should not focus on security updates to the detriment of other updates, but should instead seek update technologies that make it feasible to distribute updates for all disclosed OS bugs in a timely manner.
Abbott Tim
Arnold Jeff
Daher Waseem
Elhage Nelson
Kaseorg Anders
No associations
LandOfFree
Security impact ratings considered harmful does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Security impact ratings considered harmful, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Security impact ratings considered harmful will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-322013