Security impact ratings considered harmful

Computer Science – Cryptography and Security

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

HotOS 2009

Scientific paper

In this paper, we question the common practice of assigning security impact ratings to OS updates. Specifically, we present evidence that ranking updates by their perceived security importance, in order to defer applying some updates, exposes systems to significant risk. We argue that OS vendors and security groups should not focus on security updates to the detriment of other updates, but should instead seek update technologies that make it feasible to distribute updates for all disclosed OS bugs in a timely manner.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Security impact ratings considered harmful does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Security impact ratings considered harmful, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Security impact ratings considered harmful will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-322013

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.