Scopus' SNIP Indicator

Computer Science – Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Rejoinder to Moed [arXiv:1005.4906]: Our main objection is against developing new indicators which, like some of the older ones (for example, the "crown indicator" of CWTS), do not allow for indicating error because they do not provide a statistics, but are based, in our opinion, on a violation of the order of operations. The claim of validity for the SNIP indicator is hollow because the normalizations are based on field classifications which are not valid. Both problems can perhaps be solved by using fractional counting.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Scopus' SNIP Indicator does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Scopus' SNIP Indicator, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Scopus' SNIP Indicator will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-104356

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.