Scientific citations in Wikipedia

Computer Science – Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, 2 figures

Scientific paper

The Internet-based encyclopaedia Wikipedia has grown to become one of the most visited web-sites on the Internet. However, critics have questioned the quality of entries, and an empirical study has shown Wikipedia to contain errors in a 2005 sample of science entries. Biased coverage and lack of sources are among the "Wikipedia risks". The present work describes a simple assessment of these aspects by examining the outbound links from Wikipedia articles to articles in scientific journals with a comparison against journal statistics from Journal Citation Reports such as impact factors. The results show an increasing use of structured citation markup and good agreement with the citation pattern seen in the scientific literature though with a slight tendency to cite articles in high-impact journals such as Nature and Science. These results increase confidence in Wikipedia as an good information organizer for science in general.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Scientific citations in Wikipedia does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Scientific citations in Wikipedia, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Scientific citations in Wikipedia will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-622862

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.