Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Jan 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009aas...21343005w&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #213, #430.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 41, p.262
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
Columbus State University is under pressure to reduce the number of "unproductive grades” in its introductory science classes, to increase the number of STEM majors, and to assess the level of attainment of science outcomes in its general education courses for accreditation documentation. The authors designed a study to examine affective, cognitive, social, and classroom factors as predictors of success in science while also attempting to document the link between introductory "gateway to science major” course outcomes and the general education program. One of the factors probed is the match between students’ understanding of important learning outcomes of the course and the instructor's stated priorities. A very real risk in content focused courses (e.g., astronomy) is the mismatch between the university's stated outcomes for a general education science course (e.g., critical thinking) and the instructor's content related outcomes. This mismatch may become a barrier for students taking `required’ courses as they may not comprehend the rationale for the requirement, fail to engage in the course, and consequently receive a failing grade. Another possible factor affecting student success in science is the student reasoning level. Students who are concrete thinkers may not be as successful in introductory science classes that require advanced logical thinking about unfamiliar concepts. The authors hope to use the results of this study to help inform university practices such as placement into introductory science courses and for future faculty development.
Gurkas P.
Shaw Kristie
Webster Zodiac T.
No associations
LandOfFree
Science Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP): Design phase does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Science Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP): Design phase, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Science Outcomes Assessment Plan (SOAP): Design phase will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1703157