Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity"

Details Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity" Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity"

2000-03-10

arxiv.org/abs/nlin/0003026v1

Nonlinear Sciences

Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems

submitted to PRE

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevE.62.3000

We respond to the comment by Crutchfield, Feldman and Shalizi and that by Binder and Perry, pointing out that there may be many maximum entropies, and therefore ``disorders'' and ``simple complexities''. Which ones are appropriate depend on the questions being addressed. ``Disorder'' is not restricted to be the ratio of a nonequilibrium entropy to the corresponding equilibrium entropy; therefore, ``simple complexity'' need not vanish for all equiibrium systems, nor must it be nonvanishing for a nonequilibrium system.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response to Comments on "Simple Measure for Complexity" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-584208