Resampling Residuals: Robust Estimators of Error and Fit for Evolutionary Trees and Phylogenomics

Biology – Quantitative Biology – Populations and Evolution

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

29 pages, including 11 figures and 2 tables

Scientific paper

Phylogenomics, even more so than traditional phylogenetics, needs to represent the uncertainty in evolutionary trees due to systematic error. Here we illustrate the analysis of genome-scale alignments of yeast, using robust measures of the additivity of the fit of distances to tree when using flexi Weighted Least Squares. A variety of DNA and protein distances are used. We explore the nature of the residuals, standardize them, and then create replicate data sets by resampling these residuals. Under the model, the results are shown to be very similar to the conventional sequence bootstrap. With real data they show up uncertainty in the tree that is either due to underestimating the stochastic error (hence massively overestimating the effective sequence length) and/or systematic error. The methods are extended to the very fast BME criterion with similarly promising results.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Resampling Residuals: Robust Estimators of Error and Fit for Evolutionary Trees and Phylogenomics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Resampling Residuals: Robust Estimators of Error and Fit for Evolutionary Trees and Phylogenomics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Resampling Residuals: Robust Estimators of Error and Fit for Evolutionary Trees and Phylogenomics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-62845

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.