Representing and Aggregating Conflicting Beliefs

Computer Science – Artificial Intelligence

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

19 pages, 5 figures, appears (without proofs) in Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledg

Scientific paper

We consider the two-fold problem of representing collective beliefs and aggregating these beliefs. We propose modular, transitive relations for collective beliefs. They allow us to represent conflicting opinions and they have a clear semantics. We compare them with the quasi-transitive relations often used in Social Choice. Then, we describe a way to construct the belief state of an agent informed by a set of sources of varying degrees of reliability. This construction circumvents Arrow's Impossibility Theorem in a satisfactory manner. Finally, we give a simple set-theory-based operator for combining the information of multiple agents. We show that this operator satisfies the desirable invariants of idempotence, commutativity, and associativity, and, thus, is well-behaved when iterated, and we describe a computationally effective way of computing the resulting belief state.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Representing and Aggregating Conflicting Beliefs does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Representing and Aggregating Conflicting Beliefs, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Representing and Aggregating Conflicting Beliefs will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-262878

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.