Remaining problems with the "New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS

Computer Science – Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

In their article, entitled "Towards a new crown indicator: some theoretical considerations," Waltman et al. (2010; at arXiv:1003.2167) show that the "old crown indicator" of CWTS in Leiden was mathematically inconsistent and that one should move to the normalization as applied in the "new crown indicator." Although we now agree about the statistical normalization, the "new crown indicator" inherits the scientometric problems of the "old" one in treating subject categories of journals as a standard for normalizing differences in citation behavior among fields of science. We further note that the "mean" is not a proper statistics for measuring differences among skewed distributions. Without changing the acronym of "MNCS," one could define the "Median Normalized Citation Score." This would relate the new crown indicator directly to the percentile approach that is, for example, used in the Science and Engineering Indicators of US National Science Board (2010). The median is by definition equal to the 50th percentile. The indicator can thus easily be extended with the 1% (= 99th percentile) most highly-cited papers (Bornmann et al., in press). The seeming disadvantage of having to use non-parametric statistics is more than compensated by possible gains in the precision.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Remaining problems with the "New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Remaining problems with the "New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Remaining problems with the "New Crown Indicator" (MNCS) of the CWTS will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-608461

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.