Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?"

Details Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?"

2012-01-03

arxiv.org/abs/1201.0611v1

Statistical Science 2011, Vol. 26, No. 3, 329-331

Statistics

Methodology

Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/11-STS352REJ the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute o

Scientific paper

10.1214/11-STS352REJ

Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A.
S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582]

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-183716