Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts?

Economy – Quantitative Finance – Trading and Market Microstructure

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Do we know if a short selling ban or a Tobin Tax result in more stable asset prices? Or do they in fact make things worse? Just like medicine regulatory measures in financial markets aim at improving an already complex system. And just like medicine these interventions can cause side effects which are even harder to assess when taking the interplay with other measures into account. In this paper an agent based stock market model is built that tries to find answers to the questions above. In a stepwise procedure regulatory measures are introduced and their implications on market liquidity and stability examined. Particularly, the effects of (i) a ban of short selling (ii) a mandatory risk limit, i.e. a Value-at-Risk limit, (iii) an introduction of a Tobin Tax, i.e. transaction tax on trading, and (iv) any arbitrary combination of the measures are observed and discussed. The model is set up to incorporate non-linear feedback effects of leverage and liquidity constraints leading to fire sales and escape dynamics. In its unregulated version the model outcome is capable of reproducing stylised facts of asset returns like fat tails and clustered volatility. Introducing regulatory measures shows that only a mandatory risk limit is beneficial from every perspective, while a short selling ban - though reducing volatility - increases tail risk. The contrary holds true for a Tobin Tax: it reduces the occurrence of crashes but increases volatility. Furthermore, the interplay of measures is not negligible: measures block each other and a well chosen combination can mitigate unforeseen side effects. Concerning the Tobin Tax the findings indicate that an overdose can do severe harm.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Regulatory Medicine Against Financial Market Instability: What Helps And What Hurts? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-221346

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.