Redshift-space density versus real-space velocity comparison

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, no figures, uses paspconf.sty; to appear in the proceedings of the Cosmic Flows Workshop, Victoria, Canada, July 1999

Scientific paper

I propose to compare the redshift-space density field directly to the REAL-SPACE velocity field. Such a comparison possesses all of the advantages of the conventional redshift-space analyses, while at the same time it is free of their disadvantages. In particular, the model-dependent reconstruction of the density field in real space is unnecessary, and so is the reconstruction of the velocity field in redshift space. The redshift-space velocity field can be reconstructed only at the linear order, because only at this order it is irrotational. Unlike the conventional redshift-space density--velocity comparisons, the comparison proposed here does not have to be restricted to the linear regime. Nonlinear effects can then be used to break the Omega-bias degeneracy plaguing the analyses based on the linear theory. I present a degeneracy-breaking method for the case of nonlinear but local bias.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Redshift-space density versus real-space velocity comparison does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Redshift-space density versus real-space velocity comparison, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Redshift-space density versus real-space velocity comparison will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-497853

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.