Computer Science – Computer Science and Game Theory
Scientific paper
2010-11-04
Computer Science
Computer Science and Game Theory
Scientific paper
In considering the college admissions problem, almost fifty years ago, Gale and Shapley came up with a simple abstraction based on preferences of students and colleges. They introduced the concept of stability and optimality; and proposed the deferred acceptance (DA) algorithm that is proven to lead to a stable and optimal solution. This algorithm is simple and computationally efficient. Furthermore, in subsequent studies it is shown that the DA algorithm is also strategy-proof, which means, when the algorithm is played out as a mechanism for matching two sides (e.g. colleges and students), the parties (colleges or students) have no incentives to act other than according to their true preferences. Yet, in practical college admission systems, the DA algorithm is often not adopted. Instead, an algorithm known as the Boston Mechanism (BM) or its variants are widely adopted. In BM, colleges accept students without deferral (considering other colleges' decisions), which is exactly the opposite of Gale-Shapley's DA algorithm. To explain and rationalize this reality, we introduce the notion of reciprocating preference to capture the influence of a student's interest on a college's decision. This model is inspired by the actual mechanism used to match students to universities in Hong Kong. The notion of reciprocating preference defines a class of matching algorithms, allowing different degrees of reciprocating preferences by the students and colleges. DA and BM are but two extreme cases (with zero and a hundred percent reciprocation) of this set. This model extends the notion of stability and optimality as well. As in Gale-Shapley's original paper, we discuss how the analogy can be carried over to the stable marriage problem, thus demonstrating the model's general applicability.
Chiu Dah Ming
Liu Jian
No associations
LandOfFree
Reciprocating Preferences Stablize Matching: College Admissions Revisited does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reciprocating Preferences Stablize Matching: College Admissions Revisited, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reciprocating Preferences Stablize Matching: College Admissions Revisited will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-145798