Statistics – Applications
Scientific paper
2011-04-15
Statistics
Applications
28 pages, 7 figures
Scientific paper
Composite indicators aggregate a set of variables using weights which are understood to reflect the variables' importance in the index. In this paper we propose to measure the importance of a given variable within existing composite indicators via Karl Pearson's `correlation ratio'; we call this measure `main effect'. Because socio-economic variables are heteroskedastic and correlated, (relative) nominal weights are hardly ever found to match (relative) main effects; we propose to summarize their discrepancy with a divergence measure. We further discuss to what extent the mapping from nominal weights to main effects can be inverted. This analysis is applied to five composite indicators, including the Human Development Index and two popular league tables of university performance. It is found that in many cases the declared importance of single indicators and their main effect are very different, and that the data correlation structure often prevents developers from obtaining the stated importance, even when modifying the nominal weights in the set of nonnegative numbers with unit sum.
Paruolo Paolo
Saisana Michaela
Saltelli Andrea
No associations
LandOfFree
Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or Science? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or Science?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ratings and rankings: Voodoo or Science? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-8661