Question 7: The First Units of Life Were Not Simple Cells

Details Question 7: The First Units of Life Were Not Simple Cells Question 7: The First Units of Life Were Not Simple Cells

Oct 2007

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007oleb...37..429n&link_type=abstract

Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, Volume 37, Issue 4-5, pp. 429-432

Computer Science

Module, Division, Composome, Hyperstructure, Origin Of Life

Scientific paper

Five common assumptions about the first cells are challenged by the pre-biotic ecology model and are replaced by the following propositions: firstly, early cells were more complex, more varied and had a greater diversity of constituents than modern cells; secondly, the complexity of a cell is not related to the number of genes it contains, indeed, modern bacteria are as complex as eukaryotes; thirdly, the unit of early life was an ‘ecosystem’ rather than a ‘cell’; fourthly, the early cell needed no genes at all; fifthly, early life depended on non-covalent associations and on catalysts that were not confined to specific reactions. We present here the outlines of a theory that connects findings about modern bacteria with speculations about their origins.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Question 7: The First Units of Life Were Not Simple Cells does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Question 7: The First Units of Life Were Not Simple Cells, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Question 7: The First Units of Life Were Not Simple Cells will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1878111