Computer Science – Human-Computer Interaction
Scientific paper
2006-11-30
Empirical Software Engineering 6 (2001) 143-159
Computer Science
Human-Computer Interaction
Scientific paper
Peer review meetings (PRMs) are formal meetings during which peers systematically analyze artifacts to improve their quality and report on non-conformities. This paper presents an approach based on protocol analysis for quantifying the influence of participant roles during PRMs. Three views are used to characterize the seven defined participant roles. The project view defines three roles supervisor, procedure expert and developer. The meeting view defines two roles: author and reviewer, and the task view defines the roles reflecting direct and indirect interest in the artifact under review. The analysis, based on log-linear modeling, shows that review activities have different patterns, depending on their focus: form or content. The influence of each role is analyzed with respect to this focus. Interpretation of the quantitative data leads to the suggestion that PRMs could be improved by creating three different types of reviews, each of which collects together specific roles: form review, cognitive synchronization review and content review.
D'Astous Patrick
Détienne Françoise
Robillard Pierre
Visser Willemien
No associations
LandOfFree
Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-390994