Mathematics – Probability
Scientific paper
Nov 1996
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996phrvd..54.5993m&link_type=abstract
Physical Review D (Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology), Volume 54, Issue 10, 15 November 1996, pp.5993-6000
Mathematics
Probability
49
Pulsars, Gravitational Wave Detectors And Experiments, Observational Cosmology
Scientific paper
Stringent limits on Ω, the energy density in a gravitational wave background per logarithmic frequency interval in units of the closure density, have recently been suggested by Thorsett and Dewey using observational data of PSR B1855+09. We show that their use of the Neyman-Pearson test of hypotheses cannot, in the general case, provide reliable upper limits on an unknown parameter. The alternative presented here is the calculation of the probability distribution and repartition function for Ω using a Bayesian formalism. A prior distribution must be specified and the choice of ``Jeffreys' prior'' is justified on the grounds that it best represents a total lack of prior knowledge about the parameter. The Bayesian approach yields an upper limit at 95% confidence of 9.3×10-8 for Ωh2. This limit is less stringent by a factor of 10 than that placed by Thorsett and Dewey.
Lantz Eric
McHugh Martin P.
Vernotte François
Zalamansky Gilles
No associations
LandOfFree
Pulsar timing and the upper limits on a gravitational wave background: A Bayesian approach does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Pulsar timing and the upper limits on a gravitational wave background: A Bayesian approach, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Pulsar timing and the upper limits on a gravitational wave background: A Bayesian approach will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1750538