Poincare dodecahedral space parameter estimates

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

18 pages, 19 figures, accepted in Astronomy & Astrophysics, software available at http://cosmo.torun.pl/GPLdownload/dodec/ and

Scientific paper

10.1051/0004-6361:200810685

We aim to improve the surface of last scattering (SLS) optimal cross-correlation method in order to refine estimates of the Poincar\'e dodecahedral space (PDS) cosmological parameters. We analytically derive the formulae required to exclude points on the sky that cannot be members of close SLS-SLS cross-pairs. These enable more efficient pair selection without sacrificing uniformity of the underlying selection process. In certain cases this decreases the calculation time and increases the number of pairs per separation bin. (i) We recalculate Monte Carlo Markov Chains (MCMC) on the five-year WMAP data; and (ii) we seek PDS solutions in a small number of Gaussian random fluctuation (GRF) simulations. For 5 < alpha/deg < 60, a calculation speed-up of 3-10 is obtained. (i) The best estimates of the PDS parameters for the five-year WMAP data are similar to those for the three-year data. (ii) Comparison of the optimal solutions found by the MCMC chains in the observational map to those found in the simulated maps yields a slightly stronger rejection of the simply connected model using $\alpha$ than using the twist angle $\phi$. The best estimate of $\alpha$ implies that_given a large scale auto-correlation as weak as that observed,_ the PDS-like cross-correlation signal in the WMAP data is expected with a probability of less than about 10%. The expected distribution of $\phi$ from the GRF simulations is approximately Gaussian around zero, it is not uniform on $[-\pi,\pi]$. We infer that for an infinite, flat, cosmic concordance model with Gaussian random fluctuations, the chance of finding_both_ (a) a large scale auto-correlation as weak as that observed,_and_ (b) a PDS-like signal similar to that observed is less than about 0.015% to 1.25%.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Poincare dodecahedral space parameter estimates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Poincare dodecahedral space parameter estimates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Poincare dodecahedral space parameter estimates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-144570

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.