Pile-up probabilities for the Laplace likelihood estimator of a non-invertible first order moving average

Mathematics – Statistics Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/074921706000000923 in the IMS Lecture Notes Monograph Series (http://www.imstat.org/p

Scientific paper

10.1214/074921706000000923

The first-order moving average model or MA(1) is given by $X_t=Z_t-\theta_0Z_{t-1}$, with independent and identically distributed $\{Z_t\}$. This is arguably the simplest time series model that one can write down. The MA(1) with unit root ($\theta_0=1$) arises naturally in a variety of time series applications. For example, if an underlying time series consists of a linear trend plus white noise errors, then the differenced series is an MA(1) with unit root. In such cases, testing for a unit root of the differenced series is equivalent to testing the adequacy of the trend plus noise model. The unit root problem also arises naturally in a signal plus noise model in which the signal is modeled as a random walk. The differenced series follows a MA(1) model and has a unit root if and only if the random walk signal is in fact a constant. The asymptotic theory of various estimators based on Gaussian likelihood has been developed for the unit root case and nearly unit root case ($\theta=1+\beta/n,\beta\le0$). Unlike standard $1/\sqrt{n}$-asymptotics, these estimation procedures have $1/n$-asymptotics and a so-called pile-up effect, in which P$(\hat{\theta}=1)$ converges to a positive value. One explanation for this pile-up phenomenon is the lack of identifiability of $\theta$ in the Gaussian case. That is, the Gaussian likelihood has the same value for the two sets of parameter values $(\theta,\sigma^2)$ and $(1/\theta,\theta^2\sigma^2$). It follows that $\theta=1$ is always a critical point of the likelihood function. In contrast, for non-Gaussian noise, $\theta$ is identifiable for all real values. Hence it is no longer clear whether or not the same pile-up phenomenon will persist in the non-Gaussian case. In this paper, we focus on limiting pile-up probabilities for estimates of $\theta_0$ based on a Laplace likelihood. In some cases, these estimates can be viewed as Least Absolute Deviation (LAD) estimates. Simulation results illustrate the limit theory.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Pile-up probabilities for the Laplace likelihood estimator of a non-invertible first order moving average does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Pile-up probabilities for the Laplace likelihood estimator of a non-invertible first order moving average, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Pile-up probabilities for the Laplace likelihood estimator of a non-invertible first order moving average will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-131719

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.