Biology – Quantitative Biology – Populations and Evolution
Scientific paper
2008-07-10
Biology
Quantitative Biology
Populations and Evolution
15 pages, 3 figures
Scientific paper
Phylogenetic trees describe the evolutionary history of a group of present-day species from a common ancestor. These trees are typically reconstructed from aligned DNA sequence data. In this paper we analytically address the following question: is the amount of sequence data required to accurately reconstruct a tree significantly more than the amount required to test whether or not a candidate tree was the `true' tree? By `significantly', we mean that the two quantities behave the same way as a function of the number of species being considered. We prove that, for a certain type of model, the amount of information required is not significantly different; while for another type of model, the information required to test a tree is independent of the number of leaves, while that required to reconstruct it grows with this number. Our results combine probabilistic and combinatorial arguments.
Mossel Elchanan
Steel Mike
Székely Laszlo
No associations
LandOfFree
Phylogenetic information complexity: Is testing a tree easier than finding it? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Phylogenetic information complexity: Is testing a tree easier than finding it?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Phylogenetic information complexity: Is testing a tree easier than finding it? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-575037