Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2009-10-22
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
8 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in Monthly Notices of the RAS. This version is expanded to test additional observ
Scientific paper
We present a comparison between Gaussian processes (GPs) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) as methods for determining photometric redshifts for galaxies, given training set data. In particular, we compare their degradation in performance as the training set size is degraded in ways which might be caused by the observational limitations of spectroscopy. We find that performance with large, complete training sets is very similar, although the ANN achieves slightly smaller root mean square errors. If the size of the training set is reduced by random sampling, the RMS errors of both methods increase, but they do so to a lesser extent and in a much smoother manner for the case of GP regression. When training objects are removed at redshifts 1.3
Abdalla Filipe B.
Adams R. G.
Banerji Manda
Bonfield David G.
Davey N.
No associations
LandOfFree
Photometric redshift estimation using Gaussian processes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Photometric redshift estimation using Gaussian processes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Photometric redshift estimation using Gaussian processes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-422929