Ozone loss rates in the Arctic stratosphere in the winter 1991/92: Model calculations compared with Match results

Computer Science – Sound

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

47

Atmospheric Composition And Structure, Atmospheric Composition And Structure: Middle Atmosphere-Composition And Chemistry

Scientific paper

We present box model calculations of ozone loss rates corresponding to the results of the Match experiment 1991/92. The Match technique infers chemical ozone depletion from an analysis of pairs of balloon soundings that measure ozone in the same airparcel at different points of a calculated trajectory. It allows a quantitative comparison with model results because the exposure of the observed airmasses to sunlight is well known. The model significantly underestimates the loss rates inferred for January to mid-February. Extensive sensitivity studies show that the discrepancy between model and Match results cannot be explained by the known uncertainties in the model parameters.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Ozone loss rates in the Arctic stratosphere in the winter 1991/92: Model calculations compared with Match results does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Ozone loss rates in the Arctic stratosphere in the winter 1991/92: Model calculations compared with Match results, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ozone loss rates in the Arctic stratosphere in the winter 1991/92: Model calculations compared with Match results will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1292421

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.