Computer Science
Scientific paper
Jan 1927
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1927natur.119...51a&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 119, Issue 2984, pp. 51 (1927).
Computer Science
Scientific paper
I KNOW that I am very ignorant, but old and unrepentant as I am I still live to learn from young people and watch their doings with delight, tho' may be they are sometimes a little `previous.' The argument behind Messrs. Harkins and Shadduck's letter (NATURE, December 18, p. 875) is doubtless irreproachable and unanswerable. Probably, therefore, I am more than stupid in being surprised at ``the atom (presumably oxygen of mass 17) which is synthesised.'' Suppose, however, that a poor errant molecule of fair hydrone were the stricken `atom,' it might well be `electrolysed' and give OH=17 + H=1. Who will say me hay and make it clear that this cannot be? Uesanian orders are sometimes tall and the propinquity of the Wheat Pit may well have influenced the Chicago laboratory, just as Cambridge, being an apanage of Newmarket, is given over to racing competitions and so demoralises the whole of our educational system.
No associations
LandOfFree
Oxygen=17. Oφ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Oxygen=17. Oφ, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Oxygen=17. Oφ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-942741