Oxygen=17. Oφ

Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

I KNOW that I am very ignorant, but old and unrepentant as I am I still live to learn from young people and watch their doings with delight, tho' may be they are sometimes a little `previous.' The argument behind Messrs. Harkins and Shadduck's letter (NATURE, December 18, p. 875) is doubtless irreproachable and unanswerable. Probably, therefore, I am more than stupid in being surprised at ``the atom (presumably oxygen of mass 17) which is synthesised.'' Suppose, however, that a poor errant molecule of fair hydrone were the stricken `atom,' it might well be `electrolysed' and give OH=17 + H=1. Who will say me hay and make it clear that this cannot be? Uesanian orders are sometimes tall and the propinquity of the Wheat Pit may well have influenced the Chicago laboratory, just as Cambridge, being an apanage of Newmarket, is given over to racing competitions and so demoralises the whole of our educational system.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Oxygen=17. Oφ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Oxygen=17. Oφ, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Oxygen=17. Oφ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-942741

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.