Orbital period changes in V2051 OPH

Details Orbital period changes in V2051 OPH Orbital period changes in V2051 OPH

Dec 1993

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993aas...183.5508t&link_type=abstract

American Astronomical Society, 183rd AAS Meeting, #55.08; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 25, p.1379

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

Scientific paper

We report the identification of orbital period changes in the short-period eclipsing cata\-clysmic variable V2051 Oph. We used times of mid-eclipse collected from the literature and timings from our unpublished data to construct an observed-minus-calculated eclipse time diagram covering 13 years of observations (1979-92). At present there is no evidence of secular orbital period (P_orb) decrease. The uncertainty in the quadratic fit sets an upper limit for period changes of P_orb/P\:> 5.9 times 10(7) yr. Assuming a secondary mass of M_2 = 0.2\:M_sun this yields M_2 < 3.4 times 10(-9) \:M_{sun yr}(-1) as an upper limit for the mass transfer rate in the system. The data present cyclical variations that can be fitted by a linear plus sinusoidal function with periods 4.7 yr and 7.6 yr. The statistical significance of these periods by an F-test are, respectively, 93% and 97%. The multiplicity of possible solutions suggest that V2051 Oph exhibits cyclical but non-periodic P_orb changes, which could be explained in terms of a magnetic activity cycle in its secondary star. An incremental radius variation of Delta R_2/R_2 =~ 10(-6) is required to explain the observed amplitude of the cycle. This is of the same order of the values found for EX Hya (Warner 1988) and V4140 Sgr (Baptista, Jablonski & Steiner 1992), and is an order of magnitude smaller than the calculated values for systems above the period gap (implying proportionally smaller magnetic field strenghts). This result, along with the evidence from V4140 Sgr and EX Hya (and possibly also Z Cha), suggests that if the magnetic cycle hypothesis is correct, the secondaries of cata\-clysmic variables below the period gap also have magnetic fields, although weaker than those of secondaries above the gap. This may serve to constraint current models attempting to explain the existence of the period gap.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Orbital period changes in V2051 OPH does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Orbital period changes in V2051 OPH, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Orbital period changes in V2051 OPH will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-779316