On the underestimation of model uncertainty by Bayesian K-nearest neighbors

Statistics – Machine Learning

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

When using the K-nearest neighbors method, one often ignores uncertainty in the choice of K. To account for such uncertainty, Holmes and Adams (2002) proposed a Bayesian framework for K-nearest neighbors (KNN). Their Bayesian KNN (BKNN) approach uses a pseudo-likelihood function, and standard Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques to draw posterior samples. Holmes and Adams (2002) focused on the performance of BKNN in terms of misclassification error but did not assess its ability to quantify uncertainty. We present some evidence to show that BKNN still significantly underestimates model uncertainty.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

On the underestimation of model uncertainty by Bayesian K-nearest neighbors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with On the underestimation of model uncertainty by Bayesian K-nearest neighbors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the underestimation of model uncertainty by Bayesian K-nearest neighbors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-541156

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.