On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We show here that the recent claim of a test of the Lense-Thirring effect with an error of 0.5% using the Mars Global Surveyor is misleading and the quoted error is incorrect by a factor of at least ten thousand. Indeed, the simple error analysis of [1] neglects the role of some important systematic errors affecting the out-of-plane acceleration. The preliminary error analysis presented here shows that even an optimistic uncertainty for this measurement is at the level of, at least, ~ 3026% to ~ 4811%, i.e., even an optimistic uncertainty is about 30 to 48 times the Lense-Thirring effect. In other words by including only some systematic errors we obtained an uncertainty almost ten thousand times larger than the claimed 0.5% error.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the Systematic Errors in the Detection of the Lense-Thirring Effect with a Mars Orbiter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-568268

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.