Other
Scientific paper
Mar 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006georl..3306302b&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 33, Issue 6, CiteID L06302
Other
18
Seismology: Body Waves, Seismology: Theory, Seismology: Tomography (6982, 8180)
Scientific paper
Does the application of seismic Born theory, as opposed to simpler ray theory, lead to an improvement in tomographic images of the Earth? In recent publications, Montelli et al. (2004a, 2004b) and van der Hilst and de Hoop (2005) among others have expressed opposite opinions. We propose a quantitative approach to the comparison of tomographic images, which we apply to the case of surface-wave phase velocity maps derived with Born vs. ray theory.
Becker Thorsten W.
Boschi Lapo
Dziewonski Adam M.
Soldati Gaia
No associations
LandOfFree
On the relevance of Born theory in global seismic tomography does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the relevance of Born theory in global seismic tomography, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the relevance of Born theory in global seismic tomography will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1137163