Statistics – Computation
Scientific paper
Dec 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011georl..3824702a&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 38, Issue 24, CiteID L24702
Statistics
Computation
Computational Geophysics: Model Verification And Validation, Computational Geophysics: Instruments And Techniques, Global Change: Global Climate Models (3337, 4928)
Scientific paper
Comparison of model outputs with observations of the climate system forms an essential component of model assessment and is crucial for building our confidence in model predictions. Methods for undertaking this comparison are not always clearly justified and understood. Here we show that the popular approach of comparing the ensemble spread to a so-called “observationally-constrained pdf” can be highly misleading. Such a comparison will almost certainly result in disagreement, but in reality tells us little about the performance of the ensemble. We present an alternative approach, and show how it may lead to very different, and rather more encouraging, conclusions. We additionally present some necessary conditions for an ensemble (or more generally, a probabilistic prediction) to be challenged by an observation.
Annan J. D.
Hargreaves J. C.
Tachiiri K.
No associations
LandOfFree
On the observational assessment of climate model performance does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the observational assessment of climate model performance, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the observational assessment of climate model performance will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1425104