On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff

Details On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff

2011-05-26

arxiv.org/abs/1105.5316v1

Computer Science

Digital Libraries

Scientific paper

Opthof and Leydesdorff [arXiv:1102.2569] reanalyze data reported by Van Raan [arXiv:physics/0511206] and conclude that there is no significant correlation between on the one hand average citation scores measured using the CPP/FCSm indicator and on the other hand the quality judgment of peers. We point out that Opthof and Leydesdorff draw their conclusions based on a very limited amount of data. We also criticize the statistical methodology used by Opthof and Leydesdorff. Using a larger amount of data and a more appropriate statistical methodology, we do find a significant correlation between the CPP/FCSm indicator and peer judgment.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the correlation between bibliometric indicators and peer review: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-218144