On Machine-Learned Classification of Variable Stars with Sparse and Noisy Time-Series Data

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

23 pages, 9 figures

Scientific paper

10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/10

With the coming data deluge from synoptic surveys, there is a growing need for frameworks that can quickly and automatically produce calibrated classification probabilities for newly-observed variables based on a small number of time-series measurements. In this paper, we introduce a methodology for variable-star classification, drawing from modern machine-learning techniques. We describe how to homogenize the information gleaned from light curves by selection and computation of real-numbered metrics ("feature"), detail methods to robustly estimate periodic light-curve features, introduce tree-ensemble methods for accurate variable star classification, and show how to rigorously evaluate the classification results using cross validation. On a 25-class data set of 1542 well-studied variable stars, we achieve a 22.8% overall classification error using the random forest classifier; this represents a 24% improvement over the best previous classifier on these data. This methodology is effective for identifying samples of specific science classes: for pulsational variables used in Milky Way tomography we obtain a discovery efficiency of 98.2% and for eclipsing systems we find an efficiency of 99.1%, both at 95% purity. We show that the random forest (RF) classifier is superior to other machine-learned methods in terms of accuracy, speed, and relative immunity to features with no useful class information; the RF classifier can also be used to estimate the importance of each feature in classification. Additionally, we present the first astronomical use of hierarchical classification methods to incorporate a known class taxonomy in the classifier, which further reduces the catastrophic error rate to 7.8%. Excluding low-amplitude sources, our overall error rate improves to 14%, with a catastrophic error rate of 3.5%.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

On Machine-Learned Classification of Variable Stars with Sparse and Noisy Time-Series Data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with On Machine-Learned Classification of Variable Stars with Sparse and Noisy Time-Series Data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On Machine-Learned Classification of Variable Stars with Sparse and Noisy Time-Series Data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-152432

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.