Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2003-11-19
Am.J.Phys. 71 (2003) 1163; Erratum-ibid. 72 (2004) 1431
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
19 pages
Scientific paper
10.1119/1.1593657
Maintaining the relativity of all motion, especially rotational motion, Mach denied the existence of absolute motion and absolute space. He maintained the equivalence of the Ptolemaic and the Copernican systems and the equivalence of a fixed bucket in a rotating universe with the converse. An analysis of the Foucault pendulum shows that there cannot be a fixed bucket in a rotating universe. Also, Mach's views violate the physics he espoused: non-inertial experiments, e.g. stellar aberration and electromagnetic effects, distinguish between a rotating bucket in a fixed universe and the converse, between the Copernican and the Ptolemaic systems, and establish that one cannot ascribe all observations solely to relative motion between a system and the universe.
Hartman Herbert I.
Nissim-Sabat Charles
No associations
LandOfFree
On Mach's critique of Newton and Copernicus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On Mach's critique of Newton and Copernicus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On Mach's critique of Newton and Copernicus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-405748