Normal cyclic polytopes and non-very ample cyclic polytopes

Mathematics – Combinatorics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

17 pages

Scientific paper

Let $d$ and $n$ be positive integers with $n \geq d + 1$ and $\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n}$ integers with $\tau_{1} < ... < \tau_{n}$. Let $C_{d}(\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n}) \subset \RR^{d}$ denote the cyclic polytope of dimension $d$ with $n$ vertices $(\tau_{1},\tau_{1}^{2},...,\tau_{1}^{d}), ..., (\tau_{n},\tau_{n}^{2},...,\tau_{n}^{d})$. We are interested in finding the smallest integer $\gamma_{d}$ such that if $\tau_{i+1} - \tau_{i} \geq \gamma_{d}$ for $1 \leq i < n$, then $C_{d}(\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n})$ is normal. One of the known results is $\gamma_{d} \leq d (d + 1)$. In the present paper a new inequality $\gamma_{d} \leq d^{2} - 1$ is proved. Moreover, it is shown that if $d \geq 4$ with $\tau_{3} - \tau_{2} = 1$, then $C_{d}(\tau_{1}, ..., \tau_{n})$ is non-very ample.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Normal cyclic polytopes and non-very ample cyclic polytopes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Normal cyclic polytopes and non-very ample cyclic polytopes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Normal cyclic polytopes and non-very ample cyclic polytopes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-605535

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.