Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jul 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006spie.6276e..24s&link_type=abstract
High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy II. Edited by Dorn, David A.; Holland, Andrew D.. Proceedings of th
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
3
Scientific paper
We present the results of a detailed study of the noise performance of candidate NIR detectors for the proposed Super-Nova Acceleration Probe. Effects of Fowler sampling depth and frequency, temperature, exposure time, detector material, detector reverse-bias and multiplexer type are quantified. We discuss several tools for determining which sources of low frequency noise are primarily responsible for the sub-optimal noise improvement when multiple sampling, and the selection of optimum fowler sampling depth. The effectiveness of reference pixel subtraction to mitigate zero point drifts is demonstrated, and the circumstances under which reference pixel subtraction should or should not be applied are examined. Spatial and temporal noise measurements are compared, and a simple method for quantifying the effect of hot pixels and RTS noise on spatial noise is described.
Bebek Christopher
Bonati Marco
Brown Matthew G.
Cole David
Rahmer Gustavo
No associations
LandOfFree
Noise and zero point drift in 1.7μm cutoff detectors for SNAP does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Noise and zero point drift in 1.7μm cutoff detectors for SNAP, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Noise and zero point drift in 1.7μm cutoff detectors for SNAP will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1894020