Statistics – Methodology
Scientific paper
Jul 2000
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2000spie.4010..225k&link_type=abstract
Proc. SPIE Vol. 4010, p. 225-230, Observatory Operations to Optimize Scientific Return II, Peter J. Quinn; Ed.
Statistics
Methodology
Scientific paper
This paper describes the approach and evaluation results of the Next Generation Space Telescope (NGST) Scientist's Expert Assistant (SEA) project. The plan describes the goals, and methodology for the evaluation. The objective of this evaluation is to provide a means for the targeted user community to provide feedback to the developers, and to determine if the advanced technologies investigated as part of SEA have achieved the goals that were to be its success criteria. We can with confidence say that visual, interactive tools in SEA were found to be highly useful by the users. On a scale of 1 - 5, where 1 was excellent and 5 was poor, the SEA as a whole ranked as 1.7, i.e., between excellent and above average.
Burkhardt Chris
Fishman Mark
Grosvenor Sandy
Jones Jeremy E.
Koratkar Anuradha
No associations
LandOfFree
NGST's Scientist's Expert Assistant: evaluation results does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with NGST's Scientist's Expert Assistant: evaluation results, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and NGST's Scientist's Expert Assistant: evaluation results will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1481364