New lower bounds for the number of $(\leq k)$-edges and the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$

Mathematics – Combinatorics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

14 pages, 4 figures, submitted to Discrete and Computational Geometry, fixed a gap in the proof of Theorem 10

Scientific paper

We provide a new lower bound on the number of $(\leq k)$-edges of a set of $n$ points in the plane in general position. We show that for $0 \leq k \leq\lfloor\frac{n-2}{2}\rfloor$ the number of $(\leq k)$-edges is at least $$ E_k(S) \geq 3\binom{k+2}{2} + \sum_{j=\lfloor\frac{n}{3}\rfloor}^k (3j-n+3), $$ which, for $k\geq \lfloor\tfrac{n}{3}\rfloor$, improves the previous best lower bound in [J. Balogh, G. Salazar, Improved bounds for the number of ($\leq k$)-sets, convex quadrilaterals, and the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$]. As a main consequence, we obtain a new lower bound on the rectilinear crossing number of the complete graph or, in other words, on the minimum number of convex quadrilaterals determined by $n$ points in the plane in general position. We show that the crossing number is at least $$ \Bigl({41/108}+\epsilon \Bigr) \binom{n}{4} + O(n^3) \geq 0.379631 \binom{n}{4} + O(n^3), $$ which improves the previous bound of $0.37533 \binom{n}{4} + O(n^3)$ in [J. Balogh, G. Salazar, Improved bounds for the number of ($\leq k$)-sets, convex quadrilaterals, and the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$] and approaches the best known upper bound $0.38058\binom{n}{4}$ in [O. Aichholzer, H. Krasser, Abstract order type extension and new results on the rectilinear crossing number].

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

New lower bounds for the number of $(\leq k)$-edges and the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with New lower bounds for the number of $(\leq k)$-edges and the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and New lower bounds for the number of $(\leq k)$-edges and the rectilinear crossing number of $K_n$ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-339665

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.