Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Scientific paper
2001-10-10
Class.Quant.Grav. 19 (2002) 1465-1470
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
7 pages, 4 figures, accepted for proceedings of the 4th Edoardo Amaldi conference, incorporated referees' suggestions and corr
Scientific paper
10.1088/0264-9381/19/7/331
Gravitational wave astronomy will require the coordinated analysis of data from the global network of gravitational wave observatories. Questions of how to optimally configure the global network arise in this context. We have elsewhere proposed a formalism which is employed here to compare different configurations of the network, using both the coincident network analysis method and the coherent network analysis method. We have constructed a network model to compute a figure-of-merit based on the detection rate for a population of standard-candle binary inspirals. We find that this measure of network quality is very sensitive to the geographic location of component detectors under a coincident network analysis, but comparatively insensitive under a coherent network analysis.
McClelland David E.
Scott Susan M.
Searle Antony Charles
No associations
LandOfFree
Network sensitivity to geographical configuration does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Network sensitivity to geographical configuration, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Network sensitivity to geographical configuration will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-712298