Multi-Hypothesis CRF-Segmentation of Neural Tissue in Anisotropic EM Volumes

Computer Science – Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We present an approach for the joint segmentation and grouping of similar components in anisotropic 3D image data and use it to segment neural tissue in serial sections electron microscopy (EM) images. We first construct a nested set of neuron segmentation hypotheses for each slice. A conditional random field (CRF) then allows us to evaluate both the compatibility of a specific segmentation and a specific inter-slice assignment of neuron candidates with the underlying observations. The model is solved optimally for an entire image stack simultaneously using integer linear programming (ILP), which yields the maximum a posteriori solution in amortized linear time in the number of slices. We evaluate the performance of our approach on an annotated sample of the Drosophila larva neuropil and show that the consideration of different segmentation hypotheses in each slice leads to a significant improvement in the segmentation and assignment accuracy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Multi-Hypothesis CRF-Segmentation of Neural Tissue in Anisotropic EM Volumes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Multi-Hypothesis CRF-Segmentation of Neural Tissue in Anisotropic EM Volumes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Multi-Hypothesis CRF-Segmentation of Neural Tissue in Anisotropic EM Volumes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-59947

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.