Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2004-01-09
Astron.Astrophys. 418 (2004) 53-65
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
17 pages, 10 figures; accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics
Scientific paper
10.1051/0004-6361:20034541
The interpretation of microlensing results towards the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) still remains controversial. Whereas white dwarfs have been proposed to explain these results and, hence, to contribute significantly to the mass budget of our Galaxy, there are as well several constraints on the role played by white dwarfs. In this paper we analyze self-consistently and simultaneously four different results, namely, the local halo white dwarf luminosity function, the microlensing results reported by the MACHO team towards the LMC, the results of Hubble Deep Field (HDF) and the results of the EROS experiment, for several initial mass functions and halo ages. We find that the proposed log-normal initial mass functions do not contribute to solve the problem posed by the observed microlensing events and, moreover, they overproduce white dwarfs when compared to the results of the HDF and of the EROS survey. We also find that the contribution of hydrogen-rich white dwarfs to the dynamical mass of the halo of the Galaxy cannot be more than $\sim 4%$.
Burkert Andreas
Garcia-Berro Enrique
Isern Jordi
Torres Santiago
No associations
LandOfFree
Monte Carlo simulations of the halo white dwarf population does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Monte Carlo simulations of the halo white dwarf population, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Monte Carlo simulations of the halo white dwarf population will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-66160