Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
May 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001agusm...v42a07s&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Spring Meeting 2001, abstract #V42A-07
Mathematics
Logic
5462 Polar Regions, 6225 Mars, 8414 Eruption Mechanisms, 8450 Planetary Volcanism (5480)
Scientific paper
The small volcanic features on Mars (channels, flows, shields, and cratered cones) are key to understanding eruption styles, rates, and volumes because they are ubiquitous and simple enough to attempt modeling. Several of these small features have been suggested to be geologically recent [1,2,3]. This study measures and models small (3-50 km) volcanic edifices. Recent Mars Global Surveyor data reveal that these small features are more common that we had previously thought from the lower resolution Viking mission data (e.g., [3,4]). Furthermore, there are clear geometric differences in the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) data between regions suggesting local and regional eruption styles may vary with latitude. While a few of the pre-MGS construction models predict the martian mid-latitude volcanic shield shapes fairly well, the small explosive volcanic edifice shapes were not well predicted by existing models (see[5]), and there are a host of types-mostly polar-that are not well described by prior modeling. We compare small edifice construction model results for a percolation style model of effusive and mixed effusive and explosive edifices to prior model results for several martian volcanic regions. While mid-latitude edifices match well to predicted cross-section shapes, steeper flank slopes (See [6]; Glaze and Sakimoto, this volume) for the polar edifices suggest that the magma supply rate or the edifice permeability may be higher in the polar regions for some edifices types. However, polar edifice flank slopes do not commonly reach the greater than 10 degree flanks expected from prior explosive edifice models. Additionally, we do not observe shallow flank slope shields in the polar regions. This suggests that simple shield building may be significantly influenced or modified by volatile involvement near the martian poles, while a range of poorly understood explosive activity may be active in both regions. [1] Keszthelyi et al. JGR 105, 15027-15049, 2000. [2] Hartmann and Berman, JGR, 105, 15011-15025, 2000. [3] Garvin, et al., Icarus, 145, 648-652, 2000. [4] Sakimoto, et al., LPSC XXXII, CDROM, abstract #1808, 2001. [5] Glaze and Baloga LPSC XXXII, CDROM, abstract #1209, 2001. [6] Wong, et al., LPSC XXXII, CDROM, abstract #1563, 2001.
Bradley Bethany A.
Garvin James B.
Sakimoto Susan E.
No associations
LandOfFree
Modeling of Small Martian Volcanoes: A Changing View of Volcanic Shield and Cone Fields does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Modeling of Small Martian Volcanoes: A Changing View of Volcanic Shield and Cone Fields, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Modeling of Small Martian Volcanoes: A Changing View of Volcanic Shield and Cone Fields will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1272563