Microphysical modeling of a midlatitude “polar stratospheric cloud” event: Comparisons against multiwavelength ground-based and spaceborne lidar data

Computer Science – Sound

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

1

Geochemistry: Composition Of The Moon (3334), Geochemistry: Composition Of The Moon (0345, 4801, 4906), Geochemistry: Composition Of The Moon, Geochemistry: Composition Of The Moon

Scientific paper

A high-resolution transport model containing a fully explicit size-resolving microphysical scheme is used to study a large-scale polar stratospheric cloud (PSC) case detected by lidar at midlatitudes between 17 and 23 February 2008. The model simulations, initialized using European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fields and Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) Aura data, are validated locally against ground-based (Institute for Tropospheric Research Multiwavelength Atmospheric Raman lidar for Temperature, Humidity, and Aerosol profiling (IfT MARTHA)) lidar measurements at Leipzig and globally against spaceborne (Cloud-Aerosol LIdar with Orthogonal Polarization/Cloud-Aerosol-Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIOP/CALIPSO)) lidar backscatter measurements. By assuming a 1 K cold bias on the ECMWF temperatures and under the assumption of equilibrated spherical PSC particles, our model produces fields of optical and microphysical parameters like the total surface area density (A) and volume (V). A, and V, as well as the median radius of the PSC size distribution, compare favorably to the corresponding values derived from multiwavelength lidar backscatter measurements. Around 21 km, A and V are found to be around 10 μm2 cm-3 and 1 μm3 cm-3, respectively. The median radius of the Supercooled Ternary Solution particle size distribution is estimated to be around 0.3 μm using both the model calculations and the lidar-derived size distribution parameters. Overall, despite the simplifications on the microphysical scheme, the model is able to reproduce the salient features of the local and global lidar observations. The results clearly demonstrate the value of CALIOP products for large-scale studies, exploiting chemistry-transport models.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Microphysical modeling of a midlatitude “polar stratospheric cloud” event: Comparisons against multiwavelength ground-based and spaceborne lidar data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Microphysical modeling of a midlatitude “polar stratospheric cloud” event: Comparisons against multiwavelength ground-based and spaceborne lidar data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Microphysical modeling of a midlatitude “polar stratospheric cloud” event: Comparisons against multiwavelength ground-based and spaceborne lidar data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-834481

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.