Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

18 figures, 29 pages. Accepted for publication in ApJ. A script to provide predicted galaxy merger rates is available at htt

Scientific paper

10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/202

We use a suite of semi-empirical models to predict galaxy merger rates and contributions to bulge growth as functions of merger mass, redshift, and mass ratio. The models use empirical halo occupation constraints to identify mergers, together with high-resolution simulations to quantify how mergers with different properties contribute to the bulge population. We find good agreement with a variety of observational constraints, and provide fitting functions for merger rates and contributions to bulge growth. We identify several robust conclusions. (1) Major mergers dominate formation and assembly of L* bulges and the spheroid mass density, minor mergers contribute ~30%. (2) This is mass-dependent: bulge formation is dominated by more minor mergers in lower-mass systems. At higher masses, bulges form in major mergers near L*, but subsequently assemble in minor mergers. (3) The minor/major contribution is also morphology-dependent: higher B/T systems form in more major mergers, lower B/T systems form in situ from minor mergers. (4) Low-mass galaxies, being gas-rich, require more major mergers to reach the same B/T as high-mass systems. (5) Absolute merger rates increase with galaxy mass. (6) Predicted rates agree well with observations, but suggest that some morphology-selected samples include contamination from minor mergers. (7) Predicted rates agree with integrated growth in bulge mass with cosmic time, but with factor ~2 uncertainty - half the bulge mass density could come from non-mergers. We consider ~1000 model variations and quantify resulting uncertainties. Conclusions regarding the major/minor contribution to bulge growth are very robust, absolute merger rates have systematic factor ~2 uncertainties.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-439779

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.