Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2009-06-29
Astrophys.J.715:202-229,2010
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics
18 figures, 29 pages. Accepted for publication in ApJ. A script to provide predicted galaxy merger rates is available at htt
Scientific paper
10.1088/0004-637X/715/1/202
We use a suite of semi-empirical models to predict galaxy merger rates and contributions to bulge growth as functions of merger mass, redshift, and mass ratio. The models use empirical halo occupation constraints to identify mergers, together with high-resolution simulations to quantify how mergers with different properties contribute to the bulge population. We find good agreement with a variety of observational constraints, and provide fitting functions for merger rates and contributions to bulge growth. We identify several robust conclusions. (1) Major mergers dominate formation and assembly of L* bulges and the spheroid mass density, minor mergers contribute ~30%. (2) This is mass-dependent: bulge formation is dominated by more minor mergers in lower-mass systems. At higher masses, bulges form in major mergers near L*, but subsequently assemble in minor mergers. (3) The minor/major contribution is also morphology-dependent: higher B/T systems form in more major mergers, lower B/T systems form in situ from minor mergers. (4) Low-mass galaxies, being gas-rich, require more major mergers to reach the same B/T as high-mass systems. (5) Absolute merger rates increase with galaxy mass. (6) Predicted rates agree well with observations, but suggest that some morphology-selected samples include contamination from minor mergers. (7) Predicted rates agree with integrated growth in bulge mass with cosmic time, but with factor ~2 uncertainty - half the bulge mass density could come from non-mergers. We consider ~1000 model variations and quantify resulting uncertainties. Conclusions regarding the major/minor contribution to bulge growth are very robust, absolute merger rates have systematic factor ~2 uncertainties.
Bundy Kevin
Croton Darren
Hernquist Lars
Hopkins Philip F.
Keres Dusan
No associations
LandOfFree
Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mergers and Bulge Formation in Lambda-CDM: Which Mergers Matter? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-439779