Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Aug 1997
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1997a%26a...324..329o&link_type=abstract
Astronomy and Astrophysics, v.324, p.329-343
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
9
Sun: Magnetic Fields, Mhd, Turbulence
Scientific paper
We study the surface-wave dynamo proposed by Parker (1993) as a model for the solar dynamo, by solving equations for the mean magnetic field {vec}(B)_0_, as well as for the mean 'magnetic energy tensor' ((T))=<{vec}(BB)>/8π. This tensor provides information about the energy balance, rms field strengths and correlation coefficients between field components. The main goal of this paper is to check whether the equations for {vec}(B)_0_ and ((T)) are compatible, i.e. whether both have "reasonable" solutions for a set of "reasonable" parameters. We apply the following constraints: {vec}(B)_0_ has a period of 22 years and, taking into account the effect of period variations, a decay time of 10 dynamo periods, and ((T)) is marginally stable. We find that under these constraints, the equations for {vec}(B)_0_ and ((T)) are compatible only if, apart from turbulent transport out of the dynamo region, an additional energy sink is introduced. If this extra term is omitted, then marginal stability of ((T)) requires a turbulent diffusion in the convection zone of the order β_2_>3x10^14^cm^2^/s, whereas the conditions on {vec}(B)_0_ require β_2_=~10^12^cm^2^/s. Furthermore, the rms surface field strength, the maximum rms field strength and the magnetic energy flux through the upper surface of the convection zone cannot simultaneously assume solar values. We explore the possibility that the extra energy sink is provided by resistive dissipation, hitherto not accounted for in the equation for ((T)), by considering various cases. We demonstrate that with a heuristically modified equation for ((T)), the inconsistencies can be removed. Our results suggest that resistive dissipation is the dominant sink of magnetic energy, and that resistive heating may amount to several percent of the solar luminosity.
Hoyng Peter
Ossendrijver J. H. A.
No associations
LandOfFree
Mean magnetic field and energy balance of Parker's surface-wave dynamo. does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Mean magnetic field and energy balance of Parker's surface-wave dynamo., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mean magnetic field and energy balance of Parker's surface-wave dynamo. will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1877621