Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Mar 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006aipc..822..107a&link_type=abstract
1st CRISIS IN COSMOLOGY CONFERENCE, CCC-1. AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 822, pp. 107-109 (2006).
Mathematics
Logic
Quantum Cosmology, Quantum Gravity, Quantum Mechanics
Scientific paper
In an effort to advance a first step in the long journey to harmonize Einstein's General Relativity with Quantum Mechanics, we interpret the gravitational field as a sea of gravity quanta. We calculate the value of the mass of these quanta by imposing the condition that their energy cannot be localized in the Universe (a General Relativity property of the gravitational field energy). These quanta have negative energy that is emitted in each quantum, one by one, from every fundamental particle with gravitational properties. It follows that the emitting positive masses increase their value linearly with cosmological time (this effect is what we call the Mass-Boom and is present in the entire Universe). In particular, it turns out that the mass of the Universe M is equivalent to its age t, and to its gravitational entropy S, (i.e. M = t = S), in a certain system of units that convert many fundamental laws to very simple relations. This is the Mass- Boom cosmological model, which we have published elsewhere under various points of view (all giving the same result). The Mass-Boom cosmological model is identical to the one that Einstein initially proposed: a static, finite, curved and unlimited model, that today we know is stable. The Hubble observation of the red shifts, as a possible indication of an expanding Universe, is here interpreted in a very different way: we consider our LAB systems not to be rigid, fixed in size. If the Universe is the static (rigid) general reference, as Einstein first saw, then the Hubble observations must be interpreted as a proof of a local shrinkage of the quantum world. Instead of an expanding Universe we get the picture of a contracting quantum world. This new view is very well justified because it explains many of the problems that have plagued the standard model (the big-bang). It also eliminates the need for additions/corrections to the standard model, like the addition of ``inflation'', to solve the inconsistencies of the model. From the numerous cases detected and noted in the scientific literature, we have selected six typical paradoxical cases of the Big-Bang frame of work, not present in the Mass-Boom model. Finally we present some of the predictions of our model.
No associations
LandOfFree
Mass-Boom Versus Big-Bang: An Alternative Model does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Mass-Boom Versus Big-Bang: An Alternative Model, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mass-Boom Versus Big-Bang: An Alternative Model will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1579581