Computer Science – Artificial Intelligence
Scientific paper
2011-06-27
Computer Science
Artificial Intelligence
Scientific paper
Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules select a winner by successively eliminating candidates with low Borda scores. We show that these rules have a number of desirable computational properties. In particular, with unweighted votes, it is NP-hard to manipulate either rule with one manipulator, whilst with weighted votes, it is NP-hard to manipulate either rule with a small number of candidates and a coalition of manipulators. As only a couple of other voting rules are known to be NP-hard to manipulate with a single manipulator, Nanson's and Baldwin's rules appear to be particularly resistant to manipulation from a theoretical perspective. We also propose a number of approximation methods for manipulating these two rules. Experiments demonstrate that both rules are often difficult to manipulate in practice. These results suggest that elimination style voting rules deserve further study.
Narodytska Nina
Walsh Toby
Xia Lirong
No associations
LandOfFree
Manipulation of Nanson's and Baldwin's Rules does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Manipulation of Nanson's and Baldwin's Rules, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Manipulation of Nanson's and Baldwin's Rules will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-638098