Man and machine thinking about the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture

Details Man and machine thinking about the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture Man and machine thinking about the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture

2009-06-28

arxiv.org/abs/0906.5177v2

Quantum Topology, Volume 1, Issue 2 (2010), pp. 171-208

Mathematics

Geometric Topology

37 pages; changes reflecting that the integer family of Cappell-Shaneson spheres are now known to be standard (arXiv:0907.0136

Scientific paper

10.4171/QT/5

While topologists have had possession of possible counterexamples to the smooth 4-dimensional Poincar\'{e} conjecture (SPC4) for over 30 years, until recently no invariant has existed which could potentially distinguish these examples from the standard 4-sphere. Rasmussen's s-invariant, a slice obstruction within the general framework of Khovanov homology, changes this state of affairs. We studied a class of knots K for which nonzero s(K) would yield a counterexample to SPC4. Computations are extremely costly and we had only completed two tests for those K, with the computations showing that s was 0, when a landmark posting of Akbulut (arXiv:0907.0136) altered the terrain. His posting, appearing only six days after our initial posting, proved that the family of ``Cappell--Shaneson'' homotopy spheres that we had geared up to study were in fact all standard. The method we describe remains viable but will have to be applied to other examples. Akbulut's work makes SPC4 seem more plausible, and in another section of this paper we explain that SPC4 is equivalent to an appropriate generalization of Property R (``in S^3, only an unknot can yield S^1 x S^2 under surgery''). We hope that this observation, and the rich relations between Property R and ideas such as taut foliations, contact geometry, and Heegaard Floer homology, will encourage 3-manifold topologists to look at SPC4.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Man and machine thinking about the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Man and machine thinking about the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Man and machine thinking about the smooth 4-dimensional Poincaré conjecture will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-247094