Computer Science
Scientific paper
Apr 1976
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1976lpsc....7.3321g&link_type=abstract
In: Lunar Science Conference, 7th, Houston, Tex., March 15-19, 1976, Proceedings. Volume 3. (A77-34651 15-91) New York, Pergamon
Computer Science
1
Lunar Core, Lunar Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Permeability, Chemical Composition, Diamagnetism, Error Analysis, Geomagnetic Tail, Iron, Lunar Evolution, Magnetic Dipoles, Magnetic Induction
Scientific paper
Two different methods were used to determine the lunar electromagnetic response: (1) comparison of Apollo 12 and Explorer 35 magnetometer data; and (2) observation of the dipole field configuration by orbiting Apollo 15 and 16 subsatellites. The methods give significantly different results. The subsatellite observations require the existence of a core, while the Apollo 12 and Explorer magnetometer measurements allow, but do not require, the existence of a core. Despite this, an upper limit of 580 km has been computed for the radius of the core.
Goldstein Bruce E.
Phillips James R.
Russell Christopher T.
No associations
LandOfFree
Magnetic evidence concerning a lunar core does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Magnetic evidence concerning a lunar core, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Magnetic evidence concerning a lunar core will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1614232