Lunar 'cataclysm' - A misconception

Statistics – Applications

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

35

Astronomical Models, Chronology, Impact Damage, Lunar Evolution, Lunar Craters, Lunar Rocks, Morphology, Selenology

Scientific paper

Models for cataclysms have not been clearly defined; some involve major impacts creating large basins (an idea incorporated in present and pre-Apollo evolutionary theories), while others involve catastrophist theories (abandonment of smooth, monotonic changes of cratering rate during time throughout the size spectrum). The scarcity of old (older than 4 AE) lunar rocks is here derived as a natural consequence of known paleocratering chronology. Explosive mega-regolith formation prior to 4 AE brecciated and heated most earlier material, but no unaccountable cratering episode is evident.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Lunar 'cataclysm' - A misconception does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Lunar 'cataclysm' - A misconception, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Lunar 'cataclysm' - A misconception will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-999482

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.