Low-Resolution Sodium D Absorption is a Bad Proxy for Extinction

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, MNRAS Letters in press

Scientific paper

Dust extinction is generally the least tractable systematic uncertainty in astronomy, and particularly in supernova science. Often in the past, studies have used the equivalent width of Na I D absorption measured from low-resolution spectra as proxies for extinction, based on tentative correlations that were drawn from limited data sets. We show here, based on 443 low-resolution spectra of 172 Type Ia supernovae for which we have measured the dust extinction as well as the equivalent width of Na I D, that the two barely correlate. We briefly examine the causes for this large scatter that effectively prevents one from inferring extinction using this method.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Low-Resolution Sodium D Absorption is a Bad Proxy for Extinction does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Low-Resolution Sodium D Absorption is a Bad Proxy for Extinction, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Low-Resolution Sodium D Absorption is a Bad Proxy for Extinction will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-319755

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.