Mathematics – Statistics Theory
Scientific paper
2006-04-03
Mathematics
Statistics Theory
Scientific paper
In the grant peer review process we can distinguish various evaluation stages in which assessors judge applications on a rating scale. Research on this process that considers its multi-stage character scarcely exists. In this study we analyze 1954 applications for doctoral and post-doctoral fellowships of the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (B.I.F.), assessed in three stages (first: evaluation by an external reviewer; second: internal evaluation by a staff member; third: final decision by the B.I.F. Board of Trustees). The results show that an application only has a chance of approval if it was recommended for support in the first evaluation stage. Therefore, a form of triage or pre-screening seems desirable. We found differences in transition probabilities from one stage to the other for doctoral applicants submitted by males and females.
Bornmann Lutz
Daniel Hans-Dieter
Mutz Ruediger
No associations
LandOfFree
Latent Markov modelling applied to grant peer review does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Latent Markov modelling applied to grant peer review, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Latent Markov modelling applied to grant peer review will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-444222