Lanchester Theory and the Fate of Armed Revolts

Mathematics – Dynamical Systems

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Major revolts have recently erupted in parts of the Middle East with substantial international repercussions. Predicting, coping with and winning those revolts have become a grave problem for many regimes and for world powers. We propose a new model of such revolts that describes their evolution by building on the classic Lanchester theory of combat. The model accounts for the split in the population between those loyal to the regime and those favoring the rebels. We show that, contrary to classical Lanchesterian insights regarding traditional force-on-force engagements, the outcome of a revolt is independent of the initial force sizes; it only depends on the fraction of the population supporting each side and their combat effectiveness. We also consider the effects of foreign intervention and of shifting loyalties of the two populations during the conflict. The model's predictions are consistent with the situations currently observed in Afghanistan, Libya and Syria (Spring 2011) and it offers tentative guidance on policy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Lanchester Theory and the Fate of Armed Revolts does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Lanchester Theory and the Fate of Armed Revolts, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Lanchester Theory and the Fate of Armed Revolts will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-205116

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.